Month: July 2023

  • Roger Corman and The Fast and The Furious

    Roger Corman and The Fast and The Furious

    WHO KNEW?

    by Victoria Thomas (@Miss_Vickums)
    roger_corman

    In his 1990 biography, “How I Made a Hundred Movies in Hollywood and Never Lost a Dime” Corman wrote: “My film budgets have always been notoriously lean, while the waste and excess built into the major studios’ productions have tended to appall me.”  

    Corman’s attitude is quintessentially American: brash, irreverent, practical, with no use for the rear-view mirror, and no room for pretense. His credits are staggering: 56 for directing, and 412 production credits at last count. Corman was also willing to work as an uncredited producer or executive producer, and early on even worked for free, happy to apprentice and learn on the job. Among his most defining accomplishments: “The Fast and the Furious,” (1954), which was only Corman’s second feature. 

    High-minded film critics scoffed, and the crowds clamored for more. A scant decade later in 1964, Corman became the youngest filmmaker to be honored with a retrospective at the Cinematheque Francaise. Another followed at the British Film Institute and the Museum of Modern Art, and Corman was awarded an Honorary Academy Award in 2009. 

    By 1960, Corman was viewed as an upstart, along the lines of a low-rent Spielberg or an even more shameless Tarantino. His sprawling list of unlikely successes began in 1960, with a campy horror quickie he shot in 2 ½ days, with an unknown in the lead role. The film: “The Little Shop of Horrors.” The mystery man: a young Jack Nicholson. Who knew? 

    Perhaps the most telling tribute to Corman’s DIY genius is the enduring legacy of “The Fast and the Furious” which, although it was only the second feature produced by Corman, has spawned a new generation of lucrative imitators. Corman wrote the story and shot the picture in 10 days. He persuaded a local Jaguar dealership to provide the omnipresent racing cars, and even got behind the wheel of a Jag XK120 himself for a few of the film’s more heart-revving drag race scenes.  

    Corman shrewdly decided to release the film via a then-new distribution company, American Releasing Corporation (ARC) versus Columbia, Allied and Republic studios, all of which had expressed interest. Corman’s reasoning was that as an independent, he’d be doomed working with the big studios, since the return on his investment would take years. Instead, he scored a negotiation with ARC: he’d do three films for them on the condition that they return his investment – a mere $60,000 in the case of “The Fast and the Furious,” released under Corman’s Palo Alto production company title. 

    ROGER-CORMAN-BOOK

    Even though “The Fast and the Furious” often played at the bottom of a twin bill as a B-feature, the film embedded itself in the psyche of American filmgoers like an unshakable alien virus in one of Corman’s lesser classics. “The Fast and the Furious” represents the sacraments of Corman filmmaking: rock-bottom budget, a hard-scrabble cast, plenty of screeching tires and axle-snapping tumbles off highways, high-impact crashes, a con with a heart of gold, a jail-break, a criminal case of mistaken identity involving a wrongly accused truck driver, a nosy local in a coffeeshop who blows the whistle on the fleeing protagonist, and the tough-talking blonde and her brand-new Jag that the accused killer kidnaps and holds hostage in his attempt to reach Mexico and give the coppers the slip. 

    Giving the already gritty narrative even more edge is the fact that the truck driver Frank (played by John Ireland, who also co-directed) roughs up his hostage Connie (Dorothy Malone) to keep her from escaping, adding a bit of erotic kink to the storyline. Deciding to race her Jaguar across the border under a pseudonym, Frank locks the feisty Connie in a shed which she promptly sets ablaze. A friend of Connie’s happens to see the fire and rescues her, and Connie reports Frank to the police. Seemingly oblivious to the consequences, Frank recklessly plows through a roadblock at the border, tailed by Faber, a friend of Connie’s who crashes into a tree during the pursuit. Sabotaging his own chance for escape, Frank shows his true colors and sacrifices himself when he stops to rescue Faber. A breathless Connie roars up in a borrowed car just in time to witness this final plot twist. And wouldn’t you know it: those two crazy kids fall in love, and the film closes as the two embrace, with Frank agreeing to turn himself in and face trial. 

    Although French director Jean-Luc Godard’s 1960 debut film, “À Bout de Souffle,” carries a better pedigree in film circles, there are undeniable parallels between the two films. French filmgoers were more appreciative of Corman’s radical approach, including fast cars, faster jump-cuts (because neither director could afford tracking equipment), and a distinctly unwholesome leading man who was, as The New York Times described actor JeanPaul Belmondo, “…hypnotically ugly.” Cars play a major role in “Out of Breath(usually mistranslated as “Breathless”) as well as in “The Fast and the Furious,” with Godard casting Belmondo as Michel is a hapless car-thief, and electrifying the film with a breakneck race through Paris streets in a stolen convertible. The car-worship grounds both classics in the testosterone-laden cosmos of the 1960s antihero, a journey which begins with the Beach Boys in their hot rods and woodies (single-entendres so sophomoric they’re not even puns). Pop-psychologists now often describe cinematic cars as expressions of the phallic self, perhaps best epitomized by Spider-driving James Dean of the same era, and forever immortalized in 1967’s ode to youthful alienation, where Dustin Hoffman as Benjamin Braddock drives a new, red Alfa Spider in “The Graduate.” This in itself proves Corman’s prescience, and wry sense of irony, since his films initially seemed doomed to play the drive-in circuit. 

    A-Bout-de-Souffle-Poster
    LITTLE-SHOP-OF-HORRORS

    Examining the films side by side, both Frank and Michel are seeming brethren in their narcissism, cool detachment, and disdain for authority. A noir-ish score by the Chet Baker Quartette infusesThe Fast and the Furiouswith a pre-hip sense of lurking danger. American audiences being more sentimental than their French counterparts, “The Fast and the Furious” must close on corny note of redemption, while Godard’s work sneers at the thought of saccharine happy endings. Not surprisingly, Corman soon played an instrumental role in nurturing the talents of Hollywood’s bad boys circa the Summer of Love: Dennis Hopper, Peter Fonda and Bruce Dern, along with shark-smiled Nicholson. Directors Martin Scorsese and Francis Ford Coppola also cite Corman as a mentor and perhaps unlikely source of inspiration. Corman played an essential cultural role of transforming the media figure of the outsider, whether Cagney-style gangster, intergalactic alien, or rubbery deep-sea monster, into the personification of the youthquake, the troubled, trouble-making, quintessentially misunderstood post-adolescent who drops out, and perhaps turns on and tunes in afterward, to paraphrase pop High Priest Timothy Leary.

    Much of the reason for Corman’s early success was his pragmatic background in engineering (he graduated from Stanford University with a degree in Bachelor of Science in industrial engineering in 1947). While this academic credit honed his skill for squeezing a nickel until the buffalo cries, film was his secret passion. He took a messenger gig for Twentieth Century-Fox Studio shortly after graduating from Stanford, but pushed beyond the limitations of his menial duties to create his own opportunity by working unpaid on weekends. Although the offices were closed, production was full-tilt boogie on evenings, Saturdays, Sundays. This sense of enterprise and instinct for the long game allowed Corman to be present on set where the action was, setting down a clear path for his entrepreneurial future. 

    fastandfurious
    wasp-woman

    Corman established his niche early-on by working more efficiently than anyone else in Hollywood.  He frequently shot two films simultaneously in order to make maximum use of sets and equipment, and often travelled to a location where a crew was already in place, again saving untold fortunes in time and money. Luckily, the scruffy corners of Los Angeles County could easily serve as almost anywhere, from wartime Korea to the Old West to mystical Biblical settings. And luckily early trash-terror Corman epics — “Swamp Women” (1956), “Attack of the Crab Monsters,” ”Teenage Doll,”  and “The Undead” (all 1957), “The Saga of the Viking Women and Their Voyage to the Waters of the Great Sea Serpent,” “She-Gods of the shark Reef,” “Teenage Caveman,”(all 1958), “A Bucket of Blood” and “The Wasp Woman” (both 1959) — just some of the gloriously kitschy titles Corman released before his 1960 breakout with “The Little Shop of Horrors”– hardly called for much in terms of nuanced setting or subtle ambiance. 

    More than two decades later, “The Fast and the Furious” is a lucrative action franchise that surely has surpassed even Roger Corman’s wildest dreams. A true international box office juggernaut, the franchise series features producer-star Vin Diesel as the underground street racer and notorious electronics thief who burns plenty of manly rubber eluding the LAPD. The current Marvel format-inspired iterations win increasingly broad audiences by integrating current pop culture icons including Dwayne “The Rock” Johnson, rapper Lucacris, Gal Gadot (Krav Maga and Karate black belt martial artist, as well as former spokesmodel for Jaguar), and super-suave, Watts-born R+B singer Tyrese Gibson into the high-octane storylines. 

    The monster spin-offs now are made glossy, glitzy and glamorous with complex origin stories, astonishing CGI effects and massive, weapons-grade budgets that would have lasted the frugal Roger Corman a decade of filmmaking instead of a cinematic nanosecond. The franchise now is big box-office and solid family-fare. And Corman’s ragged, raw, original outlaw edge is long gone, along with the revving of engines and screech of “Thunder Road,” although the appeal persists.  In Los Angeles, the boys of summer once again demonstrate their machismo with illegal street-takeovers, spinning their rides into donuts thrilling enough to make the nightly news, leaving behind occasional casualties and plenty of skid-marks. Vroom-vroom. 

    This review was written by Victoria Thomas (@Miss_Vickums), a Bronx-born pop culture writer who now lives in Los Angeles. She is the author of Hollywood’s Latin Lovers: Men Who Made the Screen Smolder (St. martin’s Press/Angel City Press) and contributes to several arts journals.

    This article was written exclusively for “THE LAST PICTURE SHOW”
    Read more posts on our blog at https://thelastpicture.show/blog/ or check out our “Movie Talk” pages at https://thelastpicture.show/movie-talk/
  • All Quiet on The Western Front

    All Quiet on The Western Front

    The Illusion and Reality of War – A Classic Anti-War Movie

    ALL QUIET ON THE WESTERN FRONT: Still Disquieting, 93 Years Later

    by Victoria Thomas (@Miss_Vickums)

    In 1914, English author and social commentator H.G. Wells coined the phrase “the war to end all wars,” referencing the first World War without a whiff of irony. Since then, myriad artists, songwriters, authors and filmmakers have reinforced the message that “War is hell,” and yet the story of the first World War in the form of All Quiet on the Western Front continues to fester under the skin of modern consciousness, as recently as the 2022 adaptation of the 1930 original film, based on the 1929 German novel, Im Westen nichts Neues. 

    And there begins the irony. The novel, written by Erich Maria Remarque, a German veteran of World War I, was banned and burned by the Nazis as “degenerate.” Three film adaptations have all received high critical praise, with the 1930 version directed by Lewis Milestone winning two Academy Awards. The 1979 television version bagged a Golden Globe and an Emmy, while the 2022 German adaptation (voiced in English with annoying British accents) won four Oscars. The persistent appeal of this story for close to a century is one of the first argument for giving the original a long-overdue second look.

    After Nichols’ Catch-22, Kubrick’s Full Metal Jacket and Coppola’s Apocalypse Now, what could possibly be left to learn about the horror of war? A backward glance into the trenches of The Great War holds the answer. By the mid-point of the 20th century, warfare was informed by Space race technologies which indeed sounded like science fiction from H.G. Wells’ era. Weapons with surreal capabilities of destruction allowed troops to locate and attack targets from a great distance, with history-making efficiency. The explosive success of Oppenheimer in the summer of 2023 seals this capacity as the defining element of all times to follow. And yet in 1914, the concept of long-distance combat was new, perhaps initially exciting, and ultimately the destroyer of worlds: emerging military technology didn’t merely enable the war, but led to implosion of history and society as we had known it. 

    Superior weapons redefined modern warfare and ripped Western culture asunder. Tanks, the machine gun, the dirigible, fighter planes and chemical weapons (mustard gas) were used for the first time, multiplying casualties and introducing a new feeling of detachment that had been impossible with the close-range, hand-to-hand fighting methods of previous conflicts. This detachment, eloquently described in the original German by author Remarque, heralds the dawning of the alienated anti-hero that would define the arts and culture of the mid-20th century, from the Beats and Salinger through to the present day. In his 1919 poem The Second Coming, William Butler Yeats wrote: 

    Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold; 
    Mere anarchy is loosed upon the world, 
    The blood-dimmed tide is loosed, and everywhere 
    The ceremony of innocence is drowned; 
    The best lack all conviction, while the worst 
    Are full of passionate intensity. 

    Written a year after the Armistice which ended the war, the word “innocence” illuminates the 1930 film version written by Maxwell Anderson, George Abbott, Del Andrews, and C. Gardner Sullivan. The story begins with the indoctrination of young men, captivated by a passionate address by their professor urging them to enlist in the Army to “save the Fatherland.” In the original film as in subsequent remakes, cinematographer Arthur Edeson’s camera lingers mercilessly on the soft faces and smooth bodies of the recruits still in their teens. A character named Paul Bäumer is the story’s protagonist, embodying the naïve heroism and nationalism which is quickly snuffed out by the brutality that ensues. 

    All-Quiet-on-the-Western-Front-poster
    all-quiet-on-the-western

    The boisterous exhilaration of joining the cause fades fast in the Carl Laemmle, Jr.-produced film starring Lew Ayres and Louis Wolheim. Basic training immediately dissipates any sheen of glamour sustained by the classmates as they prepare to become soldiers. They arrive by train directly into the chaos of the combat zone, and a man in their company is killed even before they reach their post. Their descent into the trenches is their passage into hell, where casualties soon become too numerous to count, and soon after that too numerous to even register: the men become numb, moving like machines into the line of fire, unseeing, unfeeling, unstoppable. 

    Sophisticated weapons, however, were not available when the film begins. In fact, the young soldiers often preferred to use a sharpened spade versus the standard-issue bayonet, complaining that the bayonet was difficult to withdraw from the body of the enemy. Also, the shorter handle of an improvised stabbing weapon made from a farm implement made it easier to use in the tight space of the trenches, when a full-frontal attack required close-range defense. Hammers, wooden clubs and brass knuckles, unchanged single Roman times or earlier, were also common in the trenches. Echoing medieval history, the Sauterelle bomb-throwing crossbow combined new technology with old, with deadly results.  

    The advances in weaponry which defined the war are revealed in the film to ironically play a deadly role in the excess of casualties. Although the range and rate of weapons increased, they were not mobile. Thus holding the line via trench defense became of utmost tactical importance. The strategy was to defend one’s position until the enemy literally ran out of blood.   On film, the entrenched men appear like vulnerable, caged animals, or perhaps larvae, twitching in their earthy hollows, perhaps waiting for a new and more terrifying metamorphosis into a form other than human. The very subterranean nature of trench warfare lends the imagery a surreal and ghastly quality, referencing the descent into the underworld in chthonic mythological terms, and the inevitable entrance to death’s sleep in the grave. The zigzag digging pattern of the trenches, reinforced with miles of razor-wire, was effective in preventing close contact between the opposing forces. For the first time in human history, the visceral experience of face-to-face, skin-on-skin killing was abstracted. This allowed for a more efficient kill, yet eroded the sense of honor upon which military victory has always been based. The film poignantly illustrates this disintegration of belief, a global cultural implosion which would soon be felt far from the battlefield, for many generations to come. 

    The most significant technical innovation of All Quiet on the Western Front is Milestone’s integration of the era’s rudimentary sound technology with the advanced visual effects developed during the late silent era. Using two cameras shooting side-by-side, the director applied post-synchronization of the sound recordings, having captured all of the tracking shots with a silent camera. In one of the film’s most disturbing sequences, Milestone used tracking shots and sound effects to graphically show the effects of artillery and machine guns on advancing troops. Originally conceived as a silent film, Milestone filmed both a silent and a talkie version, shooting them together in sequence.  

    The film’s most defining moment comes when Paul is given a furlough and visits his family in their charming village which has remained untouched by the fighting. When Paul visits the classroom where he and the other recruits were whipped into a martial frenzy, he shares his experiences with his professor and students, who humiliate him and call him a coward. Spoiler alert: in the final moments of All Quiet on the Western Front, Paul is back on the front lines. Perhaps remembering his own lost innocence, he reaches out toward a butterfly which flits over the battlefield, and is killed by an enemy sniper. 

    all-quiet-on-the-western
    all-quiet-on-the-western

    Lew Ayres in the lead role of Paul Bäumer, the idealistic lamb to the slaughter, the still-believing predecessor to Holden Caulfield and Benjamin Braddock, continues to be a revelation nearly a hundred years after his starring turn on the original film. As a direct result of his role, Ayres became a 4E conscientious objector to Word War II, further sharpening the film’s pacifist focus. His career suffered, as he was moved onto the studios’ “B” list. This, and public outcry, also caused Ayres to a make a slight edit to his decision, and he enlisted in the United States Army in 1942 as a first aid instructor, medic and chaplain’s assistant. Ayres survived enemy fire during the invasion of Leyte in the Pacific Theatre, where he provided care to soldiers and civilians in the Philippines and New Guinea, donating his modest service pay to the American Red Cross. 

    The film is not without its rough spots. Weirdly, comedienne ZaSu Pitts was originally cast in the role of Paul’s mother. Pitts completed the filming, but preview audiences howled with laughter at her comedic presence, forcing Milestone to re-shoot all of her scenes with Beryl Mercer in her place. The now-famous butterfly scene does not appear in the original novel, but was improvised based on establishing shots of Paul’s boyhood butterfly collection. And yet, part of the film’s verisimilitude arises from the fact that many of the film’s bit players and technical advisers were German Army veterans living in Los Angeles at the time of filming.  

    Modern directors continue to cite Milestone’s unflinching treatment of the material as an influence on their work, including Steven Spielberg during the making of Saving Private Ryan. On its initial release, Variety wrote: 

    The League of Nations could make no better investment than to buy up the master-print, reproduce it in every language, to be shown in all the nations until the word ‘war’ is taken out of the dictionaries. 

    It’s worth noting, all these years later, that the film like the original novel sent a shockwave through the Nazi Party when All Quiet on the Western Front reached German audiences. Interpreting the film as a Jewish (and therefore degenerate) work, Hitler’s goons stink-bombed the theatres, disrupted the viewings by scattering sneezing powder in the air, and even released mice into the crowds while screeching “Judenfilm!” True, Lewis Milestone was born Leib Milstein in what is now modern-day Moldova, to a distinguished Jewish family. When he was preparing to shoot his wrenching anti-war film All Quiet on the Western Front from the point of view of German schoolboys who become soldiers, Universal co-founder and president Carl Laemmle pleaded with him for a “happy ending.” Milestone replied, “I’ve got your happy ending. We’ll let the Germans win the war.” 

     

    all-quiet-on-the-western

    Perhaps curiously, Milestone’s anti-war reputation attracted studio interest in making anti-fascist wartime films of the 1940s. In response, Milestone threw his talents into making U.S. propaganda films, including the 1942 documentary Our Russian Front, crafted from newsreel footage, The North Star in 1943, The Purple Heart in 1944, and A Walk in the Sun in 1945. While these may seem a bit sanitized compared with All Quiet on the Western Front, Milestone’s signature tracking shots infuse the action scenes with an electrifying realism. 

    His Russian, and Jewish, and liberal-leftist roots of course made the director an easy target for the House of Un-American Activities Committee, and Milestone was summoned as an “unfriendly witness,” because he refused to testify. Hedda Hopper’s gossip column fanned the flames of pinko suspicion, yet Milestone’s career continued, although his brilliance was dimmed by “graylisting.” His late-career film of 1959, Pork Chop Hill, was edited by the studio to soften its anti-war sting, and perhaps diminished by the rather conventional performance of Gregory Peck as a predictably iron-jawed war hero. However, Milestone’s insistence on casting then-unknowns gives the film a rough, masculine vibrance. Among the then-unknowns: Robert Blake in his first adult role, George Peppard, Norman Fell, Gavin MacLeod, Harry Dean Stanton, and Clarence Williams III. 

    Milestone went on to produce bigger, fatter, fluffier, glossier films, including Oceans 11 (1960) and Mutiny on the Bounty with the incorrigible Marlon Brando, but it was clear that his creative Muse was no longer fully engaged. Milestone perhaps suffers from the curse of early success: nothing in his later catalog rises to the level of emotional force of All Quiet on the Western Front. Looking back over history, calling World War I “the war to end all wars” sounds as naïve as Paul and his classmates rushing off to wear their grown-up uniforms. And Variety’s wish that the word “war” could ever be erased from dictionaries seems nothing less than delusional. However, we will continue to seek out art like this film as we search our hearts and history to find an answer to man’s insatiable appetite to make war.

    This review was written by Victoria Thomas (@Miss_Vickums), a Bronx-born pop culture writer who now lives in Los Angeles. She is the author of Hollywood’s Latin Lovers: Men Who Made the Screen Smolder (St. martin’s Press/Angel City Press) and contributes to several arts journals.

    This article was written exclusively for “THE LAST PICTURE SHOW”
    Read more posts on our blog at https://thelastpicture.show/blog/ or check out our “Movie Talk” pages at https://thelastpicture.show/movie-talk/